Skip to content

Make accessibility manageable. Request access

Sign in

Resources

Ask the software to demonstrate the work you need to do.

Choosing accessibility software starts with your team’s responsibilities: what you need to evaluate, who will act on the results, and what evidence you need afterward. Use those responsibilities to define the demonstration.

Start with your situation.

Are you establishing a program, following up on an audit, maintaining an evolving website, or preparing stakeholder updates?

Choose the most important workflow first. Then identify the people who need to participate.

Use a consistent set of questions.

Each area, and what to ask the vendor to explain or show.

  • Coverage

    Discovery, configured scope, failed evaluations, and content the tool cannot reach

  • Monitoring

    Available schedules, new results, and how the team reviews change

  • Issue context

    Affected pages, failing elements, and the original observation

  • Collaboration

    Ownership, discussion, permissions, and status behavior

  • Guidance

    Inputs, actual output, limitations, and developer review

  • Verification

    Retesting and how human evaluation can be recorded

  • History

    Which actions are retained and how readers interpret them

  • Reporting

    Actual views, exports, and any limits relevant to your update process

  • Connections

    Supported operations, authentication, and where work changes systems

  • Data handling

    Information collected, access controls, retention, and the vendor’s actual documentation

Follow one issue through a realistic demonstration.

Use an example representative of your website. Ask the vendor to show the issue, explain the context, assign the next step, and demonstrate how the team would review the outcome. Identify the work that takes place outside the product.

A missing capability is easier to plan around when it is explicit. An unclear promise makes the implementation harder to assess.

Evaluate the people and process alongside the tool.

Who will review results?

Who can change the website?

Who will perform the testing that requires human judgment?

A useful tool should fit those responsibilities and help the team keep them clear.

Where Ility may fit.

Ility focuses on full-site scanning and monitoring, collaborative issue tracking, and AI-assisted code guidance. If your team needs those capabilities in an ongoing workflow, review team fit and bring your questions to an access conversation.

Review team fit

Questions teams ask

Still have questions?

Tell us about your website and what you need. We'll follow up personally.

Request access

First understand scope, test methods, and how results are counted. Then evaluate whether the team can use the results to improve actual experiences.

A checklist helps structure evaluation, but a demonstration reveals how the pieces work together. Include a representative issue and the people who would use the product.

Bring your workflow to the conversation.

Tell us which responsibilities Ility needs to support. We’ll explain the current capabilities and the parts your team handles through other tools or expertise.